Protecting the Defense Industrial Base from Cyber Threats: A Growing Concern for National Security
The Defense Industrial Base: A Prime Target for Cyber Disruption
The defense industrial base is a prime target for cyber disruption, with attackers shifting their focus from traditional espionage to operations designed to disrupt production capacity and compromise supply chains. Cyber threats against the defense industrial base are intensifying, and understanding the nature of these threats is crucial for effective defense.
Understanding the Nature of Cyber Threats
At a strategic level, cyber operations against the defense industrial base differ significantly from espionage campaigns against government agencies. While government agencies are often targeted for immediate intelligence collection to gain tactical advantages, the defense industrial base is targeted for intellectual property and R&D theft, as well as to compromise the industrial base supply chain. This compromise can degrade a nation’s ability to surge defense components in a wartime environment, making it a critical strategic goal for adversaries.
The Entire Defense Ecosystem is at Risk
A common misconception among defense contractors is that threat actors only target large defense contractors. However, the reality is that threat actors are targeting the entire defense ecosystem, including small startups and companies that provide dual-use components used for both civilian and military purposes. These companies are often hit by ransomware and extortion attacks, which can impact the defense supply chain indirectly.
Effective Defense Requires a Mature Threat Intelligence Program
A mature threat intelligence program is essential for organizations that cannot afford to chase every alert. Instead of trying to detect every potential exploit, organizations should focus on foundational measures that increase visibility, ensure segregation of identities, and enforce rigorous authentication control. This approach forces attackers to work harder and take actions that are inherently suspicious, making detection more effective.
A mature threat intelligence program also builds detection logic based on specific Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) used by threat actors that target the specific sector. For example, a company that builds underwater acoustics should focus on the TTPs of actors known for maritime espionage. This tailored approach is more effective than trying to follow a generic checklist, such as the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
Identity is the Primary Security Boundary
In the context of defense supply chains, identity has become the primary security boundary. The attack surface has expanded beyond corporate networks to include personal emails, professional networking profiles, and private devices. An engineer’s personal email or a developer’s private GitHub account is just as much a part of the attack surface as the corporate firewall. Leaders must adopt a zero-perimeter mindset, where the identity of humans, machines, and software becomes the enforcement point.
Extending Security Boundaries to Third-Party Vendors
Security boundaries should also extend to third-party vendors. Leaders should know the identity standards of their vendors and ensure that suppliers adhere to similar identity and security standards. This approach is critical for effective defense against cyber threats in the defense industrial base.
Summary
In summary, the defense industrial base is a prime target for cyber disruption, and understanding the nature of these threats is crucial for effective defense. A mature threat intelligence program, a zero-perimeter mindset, and a focus on identity as the primary security boundary are essential for protecting against these threats.
About Author
English