OWASP LLM Top 10 Risks: Unbounded Consumption Simulation Revealed
A cybersecurity research team conducted a controlled experiment demonstrating how malicious actors could exploit vulnerabilities in AI systems to deplete computational resources and incur excessive costs.
Key Findings from the Experiment
The test focused on a specific threat vector outlined in the OWASP 2026 Top 10 list for LLM applications, which now ranks as the sixth most pressing security concern. This risk category, termed unbounded consumption, occurs when AI systems lack mechanisms to regulate resource usage during operations.
Unbounded Consumption Risk
The experiment involved two AI agents processing identical malicious input. The first agent, configured without safeguards, executed 500 tool calls over an extended session, resulting in a simulated cost of $10. This scenario illustrated how an attacker could manipulate input data to trigger excessive task execution. The second agent, equipped with protective measures including a call limit, recursion depth restriction, and an automated “circuit breaker” system, completed only one tool call at a cost of $0.02. These controls prevented the system from entering an uncontrolled expansion of tasks.
OWASP’s Research Insights
Real-World Implications
Additional Unbounded Consumption Threats
The study also identified additional unbounded consumption threats. One involves “denial-of-wallet” attacks, where attackers use stolen API keys to flood pay-per-token endpoints with requests. Another scenario, “reasoning-loop exhaustion,” occurs when crafted prompts trick models into excessive internal processing. For instance, a prompt that instructs an AI to “question your own reasoning from every possible angle without assuming anything” can force the model to generate disproportionately large amounts of intermediate output. A third risk involves “model extraction” or “model distillation” attacks, where adversaries use high-volume queries to reverse-engineer proprietary AI models. This technique has been previously linked to allegations against Chinese AI laboratories, which were accused of exploiting Anthropic’s Claude models through excessive query traffic.
