MHA Serves Average of 290 Daily Takedown Notifications Under New Cyberpowers
Ministry Issues Average of 290 Daily Takedown Notices Under Cyber Powers Act
In the past year since it gained direct authority to issue takedown notices for online content, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has taken swift action, ordering removal or blocking of access to over 111,000 instances of suspect content.
- According to official data obtained from MHA records, the agency averaged nearly 290 takedown notices per day, beginning on March 13, 2024, when the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) became the MHA’s nodal agency to execute functions under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
The Scale of Takedowns
This provision empowers the I4C to order intermediaries, including social media platforms, to remove or block access to content deemed illegal, suspicious, or potentially harmful to public order.
By March 31, 2025, the agency had executed the largest number of takedowns under this framework, highlighting the increasing role of government oversight in the digital ecosystem.
Criticisms and Concerns
The scale and speed of these actions raise concerns among observers about the balance between the government’s responsibility to safeguard citizens online and the need for transparency and oversight in the exercise of such broad authority.
Critics argue that the power to regulate material that is politically sensitive or anti-establishment poses risks to free expression and could lead to censorship.
Experts Weigh In
Social media accounts, messaging channels, and websites that allegedly disseminated false information, extremist content, or defamatory content came under the takedown directives.
Analysts point out that the unprecedented volume of daily notices indicates a proactive approach by the authorities in enforcing cyber law compliance, which could have far-reaching implications for digital speech and online platform operations.
Expert Opinion
"The ability to issue takedown notices directly, without requiring intermediary mediation, represents a major step in India’s cyber regulatory framework," said an expert on cyber law and digital governance. "It places considerable responsibility on the agency to ensure that actions are proportionate, targeted, and consistent with constitutional safeguards on free expression."
Looking Ahead
Stakeholders are watching closely to assess the impact of these measures on social media ecosystems, intermediary compliance, and the overall balance between security and civil liberties in the digital space.
The government’s actions signal its commitment to assertive online regulation, but also raise questions about the mechanisms for accountability, redressal, and transparency in future operations.
